OPTIMIZATION OF THE MANUFACTURING CONDITIONS OF AN AGID TEST SYSTEM FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BOVINE LEUKEMIA
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Background. Enzootic bovine leukosis (EBL) remains a significant problem in cattle production. Agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) is widely used for screening; however, diagnostic performance depends on test-kit manufacturing parameters.
Aim. To develop and optimize manufacturing conditions for an AGID test system for serological diagnosis of EBL, ensuring reproducibility and compliance with World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) recommendations.
Methods. BLV antigen was produced on a persistently infected FLK cell line and standardized to gp51 using WOAH reference serum E05. We optimized agarose concentration (0.8–2.0% in 0.2 M Tris, pH 7.2, with 8.5% NaCl), antigen dilutions (1:2–1:64), and control sera dilutions. Plates were incubated in a humid chamber at 20–27 °C with readings at 24–72 h. Validation was performed on bovine sera (positive/weak-positive/negative) and compared with commercial kits.
Results. An agarose concentration of 1.0–1.2% provided clear, stable precipitin lines within 24–72 h, balancing diffusion rate and line quality. Optimal antigen dilutions were 1:4 (eliminating nonspecific lines with negative serum while maintaining high sensitivity) and 1:8. Positive control serum was optimal at 1:4–1:8; weak-positive control at 1:32 yielded a reproducible faint line suitable for sensitivity assessment. Negative serum produced no lines. Stable performance was achieved under specified storage and operating conditions; diagnostic characteristics were comparable to those of commercial tests.
Conclusions. The optimized AGID test system demonstrates high reproducibility, specificity, and adequate sensitivity, aligns with international requirements, and is suitable for broad implementation in veterinary laboratories in Kazakhstan. Accounting for regional features further enhances its practical value.
Keywords
enzootic bovine leukosis, agar gel immunodiffusion, serology, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, cattle
Article Details
References
Barez P.Y., De Brogniez A., Carpentier A., Gazon H., Gillet N., Gutiérrez G. Recent Advances in BLV Research // Viruses. – 2015. – T. 7, № 11. – S. 6080–6088.
Lv G., Wang J., Lian, S., Wang H., Wu R. The Global Epidemiology of Bovine Leukemia Virus: Current Trends and Future Implications // Animals. – 2024. № 14, 297. Crossref.
Sajiki Y., Horii Y., Nagano M. Intrauterine infection with bovine leukemia virus in pregnant dam with high viral load // Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. – 2017. – T. 79, № 12. – S. 2036–2039.
Guljukin M.I, Kozyreva N.G., Ivanova L.A. i dr. and Vasilenko V.N. Mezhvidovaja peredacha virusa lejkoza krupnogo rogatogo skota v jeksperimente // Voprosy virusologii. – 2015. –T. 60, -№. 5.–S. 32-37.
Thompson K. Risk assessment of Bovine Leukemia Virus in dairy consumption // Food and Environmental Virology. – 2021. – T. 13, № 2. – S. 180–190.
Gulyukin M.I., Kapustina O.V., Ezdakova I.Yu., Valtsiferova S.V., Stepanova T.V., Anoyatbekov M. Detection of specific antibodies of classes g and m to bovine leukemia virus in the blood serum Problems of Virology. - 2019; 64(4).
Kobayashi S., Yamamoto T., Hayama Y. The role of neighboring infected cattle in bovine leukemia virus transmission risk // Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. – 2015. – T. 77, № 7. – S. 861–863.
Martin D, Arjona A, Soto I, Barquero N, Viana M, Gómez-Lucía E. Comparative study of PCR as a direct assay and ELISA and AGID as indirect assays for the detection of bovine leukaemia virus // J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. – 2001. - 48(2):97-106.
Kajmoldina S. E., Myrzahmetova B. Sh., Mamanova S. B., Bashenova Je. E. Sravnitel'nye issledovanija naborov dlja diagnostiki lejkoza KRS v RID i IFA // Trudy KazNIVI. –2019. – T. 65. – S. 207–214.
Tirziu E., Cumpanasoiu C., Nichita I. Performance assessment of three tests applied in enzootic bovine leukosis diagnosis // Romanian Biotechnological Letters. – 2014. – T. 19, № 5. – S. 9666–9677.
Rusenova, N., Chervenkov M., Sirakov I. Comparison Between Four Laboratory Tests for Routine Diagnosis of Enzootic Bovine Leukosis // Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. - 2022. 28. 10.9775/kvfd.2021.26505.
De Brun M.L., Cosme B., Petersen M.. Development of a droplet digital PCR assay for quantification of the proviral load of bovine leukemia virus // Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. – 2022. - 34(3):439-447.
Wright E. Standardisation and validation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques for the detection of antibody in infectious disease diagnosis // Rev Sci Tech. – 1993. – T. 12, № 2. – S. 435–450.
Buzała E, Dereń W. Comparison of PLA with AGID and ELISA results in serology diagnosis of bovine leucosis // Pol J Vet Sci. – 2003. –r. 9-11. PMID: 14509350.
Kajmoldina S., Mamanova S., Bashenova Je. i dr. Jepizooticheskoe sostojanie Respubliki Kazahstan po lejkozu krupnogo rogatogo skota v 2024 godu // Ғylym zhәne bіlіm. – 2025. – T. 1, № 1 (78). – S. 111–121.
Mamanova S., Bashenova Je., Mustafin B. Rezul'taty standartizacii test-sistem dlja diagnostiki lejkoza krupnogo rogatogo skota // Issledovanija. Rezul'taty. – 2020.
World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Guidelines of the Office International des Epizooties for laboratory quality evaluation, for international reference standards for antibody assays and for laboratory proficiency testing.. – 2012.
World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE). Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Chapter 3.4.10. Enzootic Bovine Leukosis. – 2021.