CRYOPRESERVATION OF SAIGA (SAIGA TATARICA) SOMATIC CELLS: EFFECT OF NON-EQUILIBRIUM AND EQUILIBRIUM FREEZING ON FIBROBLAST VIABILITY
Main Article Content
Authors
M. Salmenova
Laboratory of Cryobiology and Germplasm Biobank of Wild Animals, Institute of Zoology, Committee of Science, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan
I. Kumayeva, Laboratory of Cryobiology and Germplasm Biobank of Wild Animals, Institute of Zoology, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Laboratory of Cryobiology and Germplasm Biobank of Wild Animals, Institute of Zoology, Committee of Science, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan
A. Chimiruk
Laboratory of Cryobiology and Germplasm Biobank of Wild Animals, Institute of Zoology, Committee of Science, Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan
Abstract
Background. The saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) has recovered numerically in Kazakhstan, but its populations remain exposed to mass mortality events that can remove a large share of a population within weeks. Viable somatic cell banking can insure genetic diversity, yet no cryopreservation protocol had been reported for saiga cells. Aim. To establish primary fibroblast cultures from saiga ear skin and to compare post-thaw survival after passive and controlled-rate slow freezing. Methods. Ear skin biopsies were collected from 50 adult saigas of the Betpak-Dala and Ustyurt populations. Fibroblasts obtained by explant culture were frozen at passage 2 either passively in cryovials with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; ≈ −1 °C/min to −70 °C) or in 0.5 mL straws with 1.5 M DMSO or 1.5 M ethylene glycol (EG) after 2 h equilibration at 5 °C, using a programmable freezer. Viability was assessed by trypan blue exclusion. Results. Cell outgrowth began on days 6–10 of culture. Passive freezing reduced viability from 97.6% to 44.5% (p < 0.001), with high inter-individual variability (9–77%; CV 30%). Controlled-rate freezing yielded 52.8 ± 1.1% viable cells with DMSO and 62.1 ± 1.0% with EG versus 85.8 ± 0.8% in fresh controls (p < 0.001); EG exceeded DMSO by 9.3 percentage points and gave 27% more viable cells per straw. Both controlled-rate treatments outperformed passive freezing and showed 2.9–3.5-fold lower variance. Conclusions. Controlled-rate slow freezing with 1.5 M EG was the most effective protocol and was adopted for the first somatic cell cryobank of the saiga in Kazakhstan.
Keywords
saiga antelope, Saiga tatarica, fibroblasts, cryopreservation, ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide, biobank, wildlife conservation
Article Details
References
Milner-Gulland E.J., Kholodova M.V., Bekenov A. et al. Dramatic declines in saiga antelope populations // Oryx. – 2001. – Vol. 35, № 4. – P. 340–345. – DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3008.2001.00202.x
Kock R.A., Orynbayev M., Robinson S. et al. Saigas on the brink: multidisciplinary analysis of the factors influencing mass mortality events // Science Advances. – 2018. – Vol. 4, № 1. – Article eaao2314. – PMID: 29376120. – DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aao2314
Fereidouni S., Freimanis G.L., Orynbayev M. et al. Mass die-off of saiga antelopes, Kazakhstan, 2015 // Emerging Infectious Diseases. – 2019. – Vol. 25, № 6. – P. 1169–1176. – PMID: 31107235. – DOI: 10.3201/eid2506.180990
Orynbayev M., Sultankulova K., Sansyzbay A. et al. Biological characterization of Pasteurella multocida present in the Saiga population // BMC Microbiology. – 2019. – Vol. 19, № 1. – Article 37. – PMID: 30744550. – DOI: 10.1186/s12866-019-1407-9
Amirgazin A., Yessembekova G., Akhmetova A. et al. Genomic insights into Pasteurella multocida serotype B:2 from hemorrhagic septicemia outbreaks in wildlife and livestock in Kazakhstan // Pathogens. – 2025. – Vol. 14, № 12. – Article 1273. – PMID: 41471228. – DOI: 10.3390/pathogens14121273
IUCN SSC Antelope Specialist Group. Saiga tatarica // The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2023: e.T19832A233712210. – 2023. – DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2023-1.RLTS.T19832A233712210.en
Kazakhstan’s saiga population surpasses 4.6 million // The Astana Times. – 2026. – 27 June. – URL: URL (accessed: 21.09.2026)
Ryder O.A., Onuma M. Viable cell culture banking for biodiversity characterization and conservation // Annual Review of Animal Biosciences. – 2018. – Vol. 6. – P. 83–98. – PMID: 29447472. – DOI: 10.1146/annurev-animal-030117-014556
Mestre-Citrinovitz A.C., Sestelo A.J., Ceballos M.B. et al. Isolation of primary fibroblast culture from wildlife: the Panthera onca case to preserve a South American endangered species // Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. – 2016. – Vol. 116. – P. 28.7.1–28.7.14. – PMID: 27723084. – DOI: 10.1002/cpmb.25
Mattos L.M., Reis F.C., Racanicci A.M.C. et al. Freezing for the future: obtaining fibroblast samples from deceased wild mammals for the Brazilian Cerrado germplasm bank // Biopreservation and Biobanking. – 2023. – Vol. 21, № 5. – P. 504–509. – PMID: 35904947. – DOI: 10.1089/bio.2022.0039
Biasetti P., Mercugliano E., Schrade L. et al. Ethical assessment of genome resource banking (GRB) in wildlife conservation // Cryobiology. – 2024. – Vol. 117. – Article 104956. – PMID: 39181526. – DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2024.104956
Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications // American Journal of Physiology. – 1984. – Vol. 247, № 3, Pt 1. – P. C125–C142. – PMID: 6383068. – DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1984.247.3.C125
Pegg D.E. Principles of cryopreservation // Methods in Molecular Biology. – 2015. – Vol. 1257. – P. 3–19. – PMID: 25428001. – DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2193-5_1
Whaley D., Damyar K., Witek R.P. et al. Cryopreservation: an overview of principles and cell-specific considerations // Cell Transplantation. – 2021. – Vol. 30. – Article 963689721999617. – PMID: 33757335. – DOI: 10.1177/0963689721999617
Weng L., Beauchesne P.R. Dimethyl sulfoxide-free cryopreservation for cell therapy: a review // Cryobiology. – 2020. – Vol. 94. – P. 9–17. – PMID: 32247742. – DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.012
Campos Cassavia Cintra de Oliveira L., Queiroz Vacari G., Maurício Barbanti Duarte J. A method to freeze skin samples for cryobanks: a test of some cryoprotectants for an endangered deer // Biopreservation and Biobanking. – 2024. – Vol. 22, № 3. – P. 211–216. – PMID: 37944047. – DOI: 10.1089/bio.2023.0030
Rodrigues L.L.V., Moura Y.B.F., Viana J.V.S. et al. Comparison between concentration and type of intracellular cryoprotectants and the presence of sucrose for cryobanks of somatic cells derived from captive pumas // Zoo Biology. – 2023. – Vol. 42, № 3. – P. 440–448. – PMID: 36515220. – DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21748
Rodrigues L.L.V., de Oliveira L.R.M., Moura Y.B.F. et al. Efficient cryopreservation of Antillean manatee skin-derived somatic cells via reduced intracellular cryoprotectant concentration // In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Animal. – 2026. – Vol. 62, № 3. – P. 378–388. – PMID: 40579675. – DOI: 10.1007/s11626-025-01061-y
Yu I.J., Leibo S.P., Songsasen N. et al. Cryopreservation of canine ovarian and testicular fibroblasts // CryoLetters. – 2009. – Vol. 30, № 3. – P. 190–201. – PMID: 19750243
Freshney R.I. Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Technique and Specialized Applications. – 7th ed. – Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.
Strober W. Trypan blue exclusion test of cell viability // Current Protocols in Immunology. – 2015. – Vol. 111. – P. A3.B.1–A3.B.3. – PMID: 26529666. – DOI: 10.1002/0471142735.ima03bs111
Fernandes D.P., Praxedes É.A., da Silva Viana J.V. et al. Influence of cryopreservation techniques and low concentrations of permeating cryoprotectants on the conservation of ear cartilage and skin derived from six-banded armadillos (Euphractus sexcinctus Linnaeus, 1758) // Cryobiology. – 2023. – Vol. 113. – Article 104788. – PMID: 39492468. – DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2023.104788
Bennett B., Hanotaux J., Pasala A.R. et al. Impact of lower concentrations of dimethyl sulfoxide on cryopreservation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled clinical studies // Cytotherapy. – 2024. – Vol. 26, № 5. – P. 482–489. – PMID: 38416086. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.02.006
Sandoval E.D.P., Rola L.D., Jaramillo-Hernández J.D. et al. Field-applicable skin tissue cryopreservation protocols for mammalian genetic banking: evidence from Neotropical cervids // Cryobiology. – 2026. – Vol. 124. – Article 105684. – PMID: 42537550. – DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2026.105684
Costa C.A.S., Borges A.A., Nascimento M.B. et al. Effects of vitrification techniques on the somatic tissue preservation of agouti (Dasyprocta leporina Linnaeus, 1758) // Biopreservation and Biobanking. – 2020. – Vol. 18, № 3. – P. 165–170. – PMID: 32083486. – DOI: 10.1089/bio.2019.0109