A PRACTICAL WORKFLOW FOR MASCOT-BASED PROTEIN IDENTIFICATION AND POST-TRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION ANALYSIS
Main Article Content
Authors
S. Makhsatova
National Center for Biotechnology, 13/5 Korgalzhyn Highway, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
A. Kurmanbay
National Center for Biotechnology, 13/5 Korgalzhyn Highway, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
A. Kulyyassov
National Center for Biotechnology, 13/5 Korgalzhyn Highway, Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
Abstract
Modern biological research has become highly interdisciplinary, requiring mass spectrometry data generation to be combined with bioinformatics and data analysis skills to obtain meaningful results. However, many researchers who regularly conduct mass spectrometry experiments often lack practical experience in interpreting results and optimizing database searches. This practical article describes the use of the Mascot search engine for identifying peptides and proteins in shotgun proteomics. Using a local Mascot server (version 2.6.2), two datasets were analyzed: an in-house Escherichia coli tryptic lysate obtained on an Impact II QTOF mass spectrometer and a publicly available histone post-translational modifications dataset from the jPOST repository. The workflow includes optimizing search parameters, performing the search, interpreting results, and demonstrating the detection of post-translational modifications. The presented example of histones demonstrates the identification of known lysine modifications (including trimethylation) detected through search. This article serves as a practical guide for researchers wishing to improve their proteomic data analysis skills in Mascot and highlights the critical importance of selecting the right parameters to obtain accurate and reproducible results.
Keywords
Mascot, shotgun proteomics, database search, data analysis, post-translational modifications, peptide identification
Article Details
References
Shuken S. R. An Introduction to Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics // Journal of Proteome Research. ‒ 2023. ‒ Vol. 22, № 7. ‒ P. 2151–2171.
Zhang Y. et al. Protein Analysis by Shotgun/Bottom-up Proteomics // Chemical Reviews. ‒ 2013. ‒ Vol. 113, № 4. ‒ P. 2343–2394.
Yates J. R. The Revolution and Evolution of Shotgun Proteomics for Large-Scale Proteome Analysis // Journal of the American Chemical Society. ‒ 2013. ‒ Vol. 135, № 5. ‒ P. 1629–1640.
Henzel W. J., Watanabe C., Stults J. T. Protein identification: The origins of peptide mass fingerprinting // Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. ‒ 2003. ‒ Vol. 14, № 9. ‒ P. 931–942.
Cottrell J. S. Protein identification using MS/MS data // Journal of Proteomics. ‒ 2011. ‒ Vol. 74, № 10. ‒ P. 1842–1851.
Perkins D. N. et al. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data // Electrophoresis. ‒ 1999. ‒ Vol. 20, № 18. ‒ P. 3551–3567.
Nesvizhskii A. I., Aebersold R. Interpretation of Shotgun Proteomic Data // Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. ‒ 2005. ‒ Vol. 4, № 10. ‒ P. 1419–1440.
Marquioni V., Nunes F. M. F., Novo-Mansur M. T. M. Protein Identification by Database Searching of Mass Spectrometry Data in the Teaching of Proteomics // Journal of Chemical Education. ‒ 2021. ‒ Vol. 98, № 3. ‒ P. 812–823.
Calderón Celis F. et al. Exploring Proteomics Workflows: Hands-On Learning and Evaluation of Analytical Techniques in Proteomics // Journal of Chemical Education. ‒ 2025. ‒ Vol. 102, № 7. ‒ P. 2732–2742.
Kulyyassov A., Makhsatova S., Kurmanbay A. Protein Identification Improvement in Complex Samples Using Higher Frequency MS Acquisition and PEAKS Software // Applied Sciences. ‒ 2025. ‒ Vol. 15, № 2. ‒ P. 666.
Deutsch E. W. File Formats Commonly Used in Mass Spectrometry Proteomics // Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. ‒ 2012. ‒ Vol. 11, № 12. ‒ P. 1612–1621.
Brandi J. et al. Advances in enrichment methods for mass spectrometry-based proteomics analysis of post-translational modifications // Journal of Chromatography A. ‒ 2022. ‒ Vol. 1678. ‒ P. 463352.
Ridgeway N. H., Biggar K. K. Uncovering Enzyme-Specific Post-Translational Modifications: An Overview of Current Methods // Proteomes. ‒ 2025. ‒ Vol. 13, № 3. ‒ P. 37.
Ahrens C. H. et al. Generating and navigating proteome maps using mass spectrometry // Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. ‒ 2010. ‒ Vol. 11, № 11. ‒ P. 789–801.
Craig R., Cortens J. P., Beavis R. C. The use of proteotypic peptide libraries for protein identification // Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. ‒ 2005. ‒ Vol. 19, № 13. ‒ P. 1844–1850.
Craig R. et al. Using Annotated Peptide Mass Spectrum Libraries for Protein Identification // Journal of Proteome Research. ‒ 2006. ‒ Vol. 5, № 8. ‒ P. 1843–1849.
Shao W., Lam H. Tandem mass spectral libraries of peptides and their roles in proteomics research // Mass Spectrometry Reviews. ‒ 2017. ‒ Vol. 36, № 5. ‒ P. 634–648.
Eng J. K., McCormack A. L., Yates J. R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database // Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. ‒ 1994. ‒ Vol. 5, № 11. ‒ P. 976–989.
Ji C. et al. Extending the coverage of spectral libraries: A neighbor‐based approach to predicting intensities of peptide fragmentation spectra // PROTEOMICS. ‒ 2013. ‒ Vol. 13, № 5. ‒ P. 756–765.
Lam H., Aebersold R. Using Spectral Libraries for Peptide Identification from Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) Data // Current Protocols in Protein Science. ‒ 2010. ‒ Vol. 60, № 1.
Matthiesen R. Methods, algorithms and tools in computational proteomics: A practical point of view // PROTEOMICS. ‒ 2007. ‒ Vol. 7, № 16. ‒ P. 2815–2832.
Stein S. E., Scott D. R. Optimization and testing of mass spectral library search algorithms for compound identification // Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. ‒ 1994. ‒ Vol. 5, № 9. ‒ P. 859–866.
MacLean B. et al. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments // Bioinformatics. ‒ 2010. ‒ Vol. 26, № 7. ‒ P. 966–968.
Kawaguchi T. et al. Comprehensive posttranslational modifications in the testis-specific histone variant H3t protein validated in tagged knock-in mice // Scientific Reports. ‒ 2024. ‒ Vol. 14, № 1. ‒ P. 21305.
Chambers M. C. et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics // Nature Biotechnology. ‒ 2012. ‒ Vol. 30, № 10. ‒ P. 918–920.
Mann M., Wilm M. Error-Tolerant Identification of Peptides in Sequence Databases by Peptide Sequence Tags // Analytical Chemistry. ‒ 1994. ‒ Vol. 66, № 24. ‒ P. 4390–4399.
Guo T., Aebersold R. Recent advances of data‐independent acquisition mass spectrometry‐based proteomics // PROTEOMICS. ‒ 2023. ‒ Vol. 23, № 7–8. ‒ P. 2200011.
Li J., Smith L. S., Zhu H.-J. Data-independent acquisition (DIA): An emerging proteomics technology for analysis of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters // Drug Discovery Today: Technologies. ‒ 2021. ‒ Vol. 39. ‒ P. 49–56.