PREVALENCE, INFECTION INTENSITY, AND ALLERGENIC RISK OF ANISAKIS SPP. IN READY-TO-EAT FISH PRODUCTS

Main Article Content

Authors

K. Jazina

Laboratory of Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, LLP “National Center of Biotechnology”, Astana, Kazakhstan

A. Bulashev

Department of Veterinary Medicine, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan

A. Smagulova

Laboratory of Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, LLP “National Center of Biotechnology”, Astana, Kazakhstan

A. Izbasarova

Department of Biology and Genomics, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Astana, Kazakhstan

M. Kirjušina

Department of Ecology, Institute of Life Sciences and Technologies, Daugavpils University, Daugavpils, Latvia

L. Lider

Department of Veterinary Medicine, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana, Kazakhstan

V. Kiyan

Laboratory of Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, LLP “National Center of Biotechnology”, Astana, Kazakhstan

Abstract

Anisakis spp. are foodborne parasites of major public health concern due to their dual role as infectious agents and potent allergens. This study investigated the prevalence, infection intensity, and allergenic potential of Anisakidae in ready-to-eat fish products available on the Astana market (Kazakhstan). A total of 27 commercial fish product brands representing various species and processing methods were examined using artificial digestion and molecular analysis. Third-stage larvae (L3) of Anisakis were detected in 10 products, including cod liver, pink salmon, tuna, mackerel, smoked herring, lightly salted herring, and smoked mackerel. Infection prevalence ranged from 7.5% to 100%, while mean infection intensity varied markedly, with the highest values observed in smoked and lightly salted herring products. PCR assays targeting the 18S rRNA and COX II genes confirmed the presence of Anisakidae DNA in all parasitologically positive samples. Notably, several products without detectable larvae by artificial digestion tested positive by PCR, indicating the persistence of Anisakis-derived genetic material associated with thermostable allergenic proteins. These findings demonstrate that the absence of visible larvae does not necessarily indicate the absence of allergenic risk and highlight the importance of combining parasitological and molecular methods for comprehensive food safety assessment of ready-to-eat fish products.

Keywords

Anisakis spp., foodborne parasites, fish products, allergenic proteins, PCR detection

Article Details

References

Kim JY., Yi MH., Yong TS. Allergen-like molecules from parasites. // Curr Protein Pept Sci. – 2020. – Vol. 21, №2. – P. 186-202. Crossref

Purello-D’Ambrosio F., Pastorello E., Gangemi S., Lombardo G., Ricciardi L., et al. Incidence of sensitivity to Anisakis simplex in a risk population of fishermen/fishmongers. // Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. – 2000. – Vol. 84, № 4. – P. 439-444. Crossref

Pravettoni V., Primavesi L., Piantanida M. Anisakis simplex: current knowledge. // Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. – 2012. – Vol. 44, № 4. – P.150-156.

Valls A., Pascual C. Y., Martin Esteban M. Anisakis allergy: An update. // Rev. Fr. Allergol. Immunol. Clin. – 2005. – Vol. 45, № 2. – P. 108–113. Crossref

Audicana M. T., Ansotegui I. J., de Corres L. F., Kennedy M. W. Anisakis simplex: Dangerous dead and alive? // Trends Parasitol. – 2002. – Vol. 18, № 1. – P. 20–25. Crossref

Kleter G. A., Prandini A., Filippi L., Marvin H. J. P. Identification of potentially emerging food safety issues by analysis of reports published by the European Community’s Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (RASFF) during a four-year period. // Food Chem. Toxicol. – 2009. – Vol. 47, № 5. – P. 932–950. Crossref

Armentia A., Martin-Gil F. J., Pascual C., Martin-Esteban M., Callejo A., Martinez C. Anisakis simplex allergy after eating chicken meat. // J. Invest. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. – 2006. – Vol. 16, № 4. – P. 258–263.

Caballero M., Moneo I. Several allergens from Anisakis simplex are highly resistant to heat and pepsin treatments. // Parasitol. Res. – 2004. – № 93. – P. 248–251. Crossref

Moneo I., Caballero M. L., Gonzalez-Munoz M., Rodriguez- Mahillo A. I., Rodriguez-Perez R., Silva A. Isolation of a heat- resistant allergen from the fish parasite Anisakis simplex. // Parasitol. Res. – 2005. – Vol. 96, №5. – P. 285–289. doi:10.1007/s00436-005-1362-2

Ventura M. T., Tummolo R. A., Di Leo E., D’Ersasmo M., Arsieni A. Immediate and cell-mediated reactions in parasitic infections by Anisakis simplex. // J. Invest. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. – 2008. – Vol. 18, №54. – P. 253–259.

Holzhauser T., Stephan O., Vieths S. Detection of potentially allergenic hazelnut (Corylus avellana) residues in food: A comparative study with DNA PCR-ELISA and protein sandwich-ELISA. // J. Agric. Food Chem. – 2002. – Vol. 50, №21. P. 5808–5815. Crossref

Mills E. N. C., Potts A., Plumb G. W., Lambert N., Morgan M. R. A. Development of a rapid dipstick immunoassay for the detection of peanut contamination of food. // Food Agric. Immunol. – 1997. – Vol. 9 №1. – P. 37–50. Crossref

Restani P., Plebani A., Velon´a T., Cavagni G., Ugazio A. G., Poiesi C., Muraro A., Galli C. L. Use of immunoblotting and monoclonal antibodies to evaluate the residual antigenic activity of milk protein hydrolysed formulae. // Clin. Exp. Allergy. – 1996. – Vol. 26, №10. – P. 1182–1187.

Stephan O., Vieths S. Development of a real-time PCR and a sandwich ELISA for detection of potentially allergenic trace amounts of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) in processed foods. // J. Agric. Food Chem. – 2004. – Vol. 52, №12. P. 3754–3760. doi:10.1021/jf035178u

Rodriguez-Perez R., Moneo I., Rodriguez-Mahillo A., Caballero M. L. Cloning and expression of Ani s 9, a new Anisakis simplex allergen. // Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. – 2008. – Vol. 158, №2. P. 92–97. doi:10.1016/j.molbiopara.2008.02.008

Poms R. E., Anklam E. Polymerase chain reaction techniques for food allergen detection. // J. AOAC Int. – 2004. – Vol. 87, №6. – P. 1391–1397.

Dahinden I., von Büren M., Lüthy J. A quantitative competitive PCR system to detect contamination of wheat, barley or rye in gluten-free food for coeliac patients. // Eur. Food Res. Technol. – 2001. – Vol. 212, №2. – P. 228–233. Crossref

Pardo M. A., P´erez-Villareal B. Identification of commercial canned tuna species by restriction site analysis of mitochondrial DNA products obtained by nested primer PCR. // Food Chem. – 2004. – Vol. 86, №1. – P. 143–150. Crossref

González-Soñora R., Ramilo A., Ríos-Castro R., Abollo E., & Pascual S. Detection of Anisakis spp. (Nematoda, Anisakidae) in frozen and processed hake products marketed in Spain. // International journal of food microbiology. – 2026. – Vol. 450, №111645. Crossref

Hamada Y., Sugano S., Kamide Y., Sekiya K., Fukutomi Y. Anisakis allergy versus gastric anisakiasis: A case of repeated Anisakis-associated symptoms. // J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. – 2024. – Vol. 3, № 2:100207. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100207.

Daschner A., Cuéllar C. Progress in Anisakis Allergy Research: Milestones and Reversals. // Curr Treat Options Allergy. – 2020. – Vol. 7. – P. 457–470. Crossref

Smith J. W., Wootten R. Anisakis larvae (“herringworm”) (Nematoda) in fish. Parasitose des poissons par les larves du nématode Anisakis. In: Sindermann C. J. (Ed.). Fiches d’identification des maladies et parasites des poissons, crustacés et mollusques. – International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Copenhagen, Denmark. – 1984.

Berland B. Identification of larval nematodes from fish. Nematode problems in North Atlantic fish. In: Nematode Problems in North Atlantic Fish; Møller, H. (Ed.). Report from a workshop held in Kiel, Germany. – International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Copenhagen, Denmark. – 1989. – P. 16–22.

Zilberman N., Reikhav S., Hulata G., Ron M. High-throughput genomic DNA extraction protocol from tilapia’s fin tissue. // Aquaculture. – 2006. – Vol. 255, №1–4. P. 597–599. Crossref

Sambrook J., Fritsch E. F., Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. – Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA. – 1989. – Vol. 1-3.

Mossali C., Palermo S., Capra E., Piccolo G., Botti S., Bandi C., D'Amelio S., & Giuffra E. Sensitive detection and quantification of anisakid parasite residues in food products. // Foodborne pathogens and disease. – 2010. Vol. 7, № 4. – P. 391–397. Crossref

Lopez I., & Pardo M. A. Evaluation of a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for detection of Anisakis simplex parasite as a food-borne allergen source in seafood products. // Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. – 2010. – Vol. 58, № 3. – P. 1469–1477. Crossref

Shvydka S., Sarabeev V., Estruch V. D., Cadarso-Suárez C. Optimum sample size to estimate mean parasite abundance in fish parasite surveys. // Helminthologia. – 2000. – Vol. 55, № 1. – P. 52–59. Crossref

Rozsa L., Reiczigel J., & Majoros G. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. // Journal of Parasitology. – 2000. – Vol. 86, № 2. – P. 228-232. Crossref

Carballeda-Sangiao N., Rodríguez-Mahillo A. I., Careche M., Navas A., Caballero T., Dominguez-Ortega J., Jurado-Palomo J., & González-Muñoz M. Ani s 11-Like Protein Is a Pepsin- and Heat-Resistant Major Allergen of Anisakis spp. and a Valuable Tool for Anisakis Allergy Component-Resolved Diagnosis. // International archives of allergy and immunology. – 2016. – Vol. 169, № 2. P. 108–112. Crossref

Kochanowski M., Różycki M., Dąbrowska J., Karamon J., Sroka J., Antolak E., Bełcik A., & Cencek T. Development and Application of Novel Chemiluminescence Immunoassays for Highly Sensitive Detection of Anisakis simplex Proteins in Thermally Processed Seafood. // Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland). – 2020. – Vol. 9, № 10. – P. 777. Crossref

Majstorović J., Herfurth U.M., Mladineo I., Winkel M. Assessing allergenic potential, exposure and risk of Anisakis spp. // EFSA J. – 2025. – Vol. 23, (Suppl 1):e231106. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.e231106.